Saturday, January 27, 2024

Why Receipt Notifications Increase Security In Signal

This blog post is aimed to express and explain my surprise about Signal being more secure than I thought (due to receipt acknowledgments). I hope you find it interesting, too.

Signal, and especially its state update protocol, the Double Ratchet algorithm, are widely known for significantly increasing security for instant messaging. While most users first see the end-to-end security induced by employing Signal in messaging apps, the properties achieved due to ratcheting go far beyond protecting communication against (active) attackers on the wire. Due to updating the local device secrets via the Double Ratchet algorithm, the protocol ensures that attackers, who temporarily obtain a device's local storage (on which Signal runs), only compromise confidentiality of parts of the communications with this device. Thus, the leakage of local secrets from a device only affects security of a short frame of communication. The exact duration of compromise depends on the messaging pattern among the communicating parties (i.e., who sends and receives when), as the state update is conducted during the sending and receiving of payload messages.


The Double Ratchet

The Double Ratchet algorithm consists of two different update mechanisms: the symmetric ratchet and the asymmetric ratchet. The former updates symmetric key material by hashing and then overwriting it with the hash output (i.e.,  k:=H(k)). Thus, an attacker, obtaining key material can only predict future versions of the state but, due to the one-wayness of the hash function, cannot recover past states. The asymmetric ratchet consists of Diffie-Hellman key exchanges (DHKE). If, during the communication, party A receives a new DH share gb as part of a message from the communication partner B, then A samples a new DH exponent a and responds with the respective DH share ga in the next sent message. On receipt of this DH share, B will again sample a new DH exponent b' and attach the DH share gb' to the next message to A. With every new DH share, a new DHKE gab is computed among A and B and mixed into the key material (i.e., k:=H(k,gab)). For clarity, I leave out a lot of details and accuracy. As new DH shares ga and gb are generated from randomly sampled DH exponents a and b, and the computation of gab is hard if neither a nor b are known, the key material recovers from an exposure of the local secrets to an attacker after a new value gab was freshly established and mixed into it. Summing up this mechanism, if an attacker obtains the local state of a Signal client, then this attacker cannot recover any previously received message (if the message itself was not contained in the local state), nor can it read messages that are sent after a new gab was established and mixed into the state. The latter case happens with every full round-trip among A and B (i.e., A receives from B, A sends to B, and A receives again from B).
Conceptual depiction of Double Ratchet in Signal two years ago (acknowledgments were only protected between client and server). The asymmetric ratchet fully updates the local secrets after one round-trip of payload messages.

Research on Ratcheting

During the last two years, the Signal protocol inspired the academic research community: First, a formal security proof of Signal was conducted [1] and then ratcheting was formalized as a generic primitive (independent of Signal) [2,3,4]. This formalization includes security definitions that are derived via 1. defining an attacker, 2. requiring security unless it is obvious that security cannot be reached. Protocols, meeting this optimal notion of security, were less performant than the Double Ratchet algorithm [3,4]. However, it became evident that the Double Ratchet algorithm is not as secure as it could be (e.g., recovery from exposure could be achieved quicker than after a full round-trip; see, e.g., Appendix G of our paper [3]). Afterwards, protocols (for slightly weakened security notions) were proposed that are similarly performant as Signal but also a bit more secure [5,6,7].

Protecting Acknowledgments ...

In our analysis of instant messaging group chats [8] two years ago (blog posts: [9,10]), we found out that none of the group chat protocols (Signal, WhatsApp, Threema) actually achieves real recovery from an exposure (thus the asymmetric ratchet is not really effective in groups; a good motivation for the MLS project) and that receipt acknowledgments were not integrity protected in Signal nor WhatsApp. The latter issue allowed an attacker to drop payload messages in transmission and forge receipt acknowledgments to the sender such that the sender falsely thinks the message was received. Signal quickly reacted on our report by treating acknowledgments as normal payload messages: they are now authenticated(-encrypted) using the Double Ratchet algorithm.

... Supports Asymmetric Ratchet

Two years after our analysis, I recently looked into the Signal code again. For a training on ratcheting I wanted to create an exercise for which the lines in the code should be found that execute the symmetric and the asymmetric ratchet respectively. Somehow I observed that the pure symmetric ratchet (only updates via hash functions) was nearly never executed (especially not when I expected it) when lively debugging the app but almost always new DH shares were sent or received. I realized that, due to encrypting the receipt acknowledgments now, the app always conducts full round-trips with every payload message. In order to observe the symmetric ratchet, I needed to temporarily turn on the flight mode on my phone such that acknowledgments are not immediately returned.
Conceptual depiction of Double Ratchet in Signal now (acknowledgments encrypted). The asymmetric ratchet fully updates the local secrets after an acknowledgment for a message is received.

Consequently, Signal conducts a full DHKE on every sent payload message (in case the receiving device is not offline) and mixes the result into the state. However, a new DH exponent is always already sampled on the previous receipt (see sketch of protocol above). Thus, the exponent for computing a DHKE maybe remained in the local device state for a while. In order to fully update the state's key material, two round-trips must be initiated by sending two payload messages and receiving the resulting two acknowledgments. Please note that not only the mandatory receipt acknowledgments are encrypted but also notifications on typing and reading a message.

If you didn't understand exactly what that means, here a tl;dr: If an attacker obtains your local device state, then with Signal all previous messages stay secure and (if the attacker does not immediately use these secrets to actively manipulate future conversations) all future messages are secure after you wrote two messages (and received receipt acknowledgments) in all of your conversations. Even though this is very (in practice certainly sufficiently) secure, recent protocols provide stronger security (as mentioned above) and it remains an interesting research goal to increase their performance.

[1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1013.pdf
[2] https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1028.pdf
[3] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/296.pdf
[4] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/553.pdf
[5] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/889.pdf
[6] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/954.pdf
[7] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/1037.pdf
[8] https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/713.pdf
[9] https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2017/07/insecurities-of-whatsapps-signals-and.html
[10] https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2018/01/group-instant-messaging-why-baming.html
Related word

  1. Hack Website Online Tool
  2. Kik Hack Tools
  3. How To Make Hacking Tools
  4. Pentest Tools Bluekeep
  5. How To Hack
  6. Hack And Tools
  7. Hacker Security Tools
  8. Beginner Hacker Tools
  9. Hacking Apps
  10. Hack Tools
  11. Pentest Tools Open Source
  12. Hacker Tools 2020
  13. Hacker Tools Online
  14. Hack Tools For Windows
  15. New Hacker Tools
  16. Pentest Tools Nmap
  17. Free Pentest Tools For Windows
  18. Hacker Tools Github
  19. Hacker Tools
  20. Pentest Tools Android
  21. Hack Apps
  22. Hacking Tools For Windows Free Download
  23. Hacking Tools 2019
  24. Hacker Tools Github
  25. Best Hacking Tools 2020
  26. Computer Hacker
  27. Tools For Hacker
  28. Hacking Tools Windows
  29. Hacking Tools
  30. Pentest Tools Nmap
  31. Best Hacking Tools 2019
  32. Best Hacking Tools 2019
  33. Computer Hacker
  34. Usb Pentest Tools
  35. Hacker Tools For Windows
  36. Pentest Tools Linux
  37. Hacker
  38. Best Hacking Tools 2020
  39. Hack Tools 2019
  40. What Are Hacking Tools
  41. Game Hacking
  42. Hacking Tools Software
  43. Hack And Tools
  44. Hacking Tools Online
  45. Hack Website Online Tool
  46. Hacking Tools For Windows
  47. Computer Hacker
  48. New Hack Tools
  49. Hacking Tools Name
  50. Underground Hacker Sites
  51. Pentest Tools Port Scanner
  52. Hacker Hardware Tools
  53. Hacking Tools Hardware
  54. Hack Website Online Tool
  55. Hacking Tools Free Download
  56. Hacking App
  57. Hacking Tools Kit
  58. Hacker Tools List
  59. Pentest Tools Kali Linux
  60. Hacking Tools For Windows
  61. Pentest Tools Port Scanner
  62. Pentest Tools Apk
  63. Hack Tools Download
  64. Hack Tools Pc
  65. Hack Tools For Windows
  66. Hack Tools For Ubuntu
  67. Pentest Tools Download
  68. Hacking Tools Free Download
  69. Kik Hack Tools
  70. Hacking Apps
  71. Pentest Tools For Windows
  72. Hack Tools For Pc
  73. Termux Hacking Tools 2019
  74. Underground Hacker Sites
  75. Hacking App
  76. Tools Used For Hacking
  77. Hacking Tools For Kali Linux
  78. Hack Tool Apk
  79. World No 1 Hacker Software
  80. Hack Tools
  81. Best Hacking Tools 2019
  82. Hack Tools For Mac
  83. Hacking Tools And Software
  84. Pentest Reporting Tools
  85. Pentest Tools
  86. What Are Hacking Tools
  87. Nsa Hack Tools
  88. Hack Tool Apk No Root
  89. Pentest Tools Apk
  90. Blackhat Hacker Tools
  91. New Hacker Tools
  92. Hacking Tools Kit
  93. Blackhat Hacker Tools
  94. Install Pentest Tools Ubuntu
  95. World No 1 Hacker Software
  96. Hacking Tools For Beginners
  97. Hack Apps
  98. Hacking Tools Software
  99. Hack Tools
  100. Pentest Recon Tools
  101. Hacker Techniques Tools And Incident Handling
  102. Computer Hacker
  103. Hack Tools
  104. Pentest Tools For Android
  105. Easy Hack Tools
  106. Hacking Tools Software
  107. Pentest Tools Linux
  108. Hack Tools For Windows
  109. Pentest Tools
  110. Hacker Hardware Tools
  111. Hack Tools Online
  112. Growth Hacker Tools
  113. Hack Tools For Games
  114. Hacker Tools Software
  115. Hacker Tools For Mac
  116. Wifi Hacker Tools For Windows
  117. Pentest Automation Tools
  118. Hacker Tools Free
  119. Pentest Tools
  120. Hacking App
  121. Pentest Tools Free
  122. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  123. Hacker Tools List
  124. Hacker Tools 2019

No comments:

Post a Comment